There’s this weird phenomenon where you meet someone new and then 1 second later it’s impossible to remember each other’s names.
If I didn’t care about them 10 seconds ago, I’m not gonna care about them all of a sudden as if they were my newborn (whom I’d name Genghis (Hahn) so I don’t forget).
But what can I say? It’s impressive, for that exact reason, when someone actually remembers your name in conversation without having to say, “Sorry what was your name again? I’m so terrible with names hahahahaha.”
One of the themes I advocate is to focus more on “big wins” and needle movers. Not spending an ungodly number of hours exhausting yourself with lectures, flashcard arts and crafts, or endless memorization.
However, memorizing (or more directly, remembering) is still an unavoidable base requirement for succeeding on your essays and the MBE.
And the fact is, your bar exam requires you to remember a LOT. The typical brain is made for processing data but not so much for forcing discrete information to be inscribed into your memory forever.
However, the brain is great at absorbing experiences and making powerful connections: When the same neurons get used over and over, or certain neurons get triggered hard, the connection gets stronger; as those neurons are fed that input less and less, the connection drops. Sounds like, you know, a muscle.
Put simply, you can train your brain to remember the important stuff through repetition. No wonder habit evidence is more powerful than character evidence!
Frequency of recall and attempts to recall are the basis of all memorization.
Not just being familiar with the rules, not reading them and saying “yeah, I know this”—but recalling and attempting to recall. It’s the so-called retrieval practice.
Before we proceed, here’s a fairly common trap: relying too much on memorizing.
I get it. It feels safe. It feels like the way to do it. Memorizing rules is needed after all.
But the test isn’t about whether you can memorize rules. It’s not even really about whether you can recall the rules.
It’s whether you can identify the relevant issues. It’s whether you can use the rules to come to the right conclusion. Recalling (in the right context) is part of it… and it is table stakes.
You could collect all the bullets you want, but can you hit the target?
“Only knowledge that is used sticks in your mind.”
With that said, the following are some ways you can use to solidify that hazy jumble of rules in your head.
Memorizing for the Bar Exam: How to Remember and Recite the Rules
1. Test yourself through recall in real situations.
You do this all the time.
When you remember the way to a new place you go to over and over. When you’re playing an instrument and focus on one part of the piece until it sounds right before moving onto another part. Your student ID, phone number, account passwords, buddies’ screen names on AIM (rest in peace), etc.
Committing something to memory is accomplished by initially failing to remember, then attempting to recall it over and over. In other words, what your brain remembers what it needs to remember.
Guess what helps with this? Actually solving problems and using the rules in context.
The benefits are three-fold (on top of giving you the practice you need):
▶ You learn how a particular issue and a particular rule/nuance/exception interact together contextually. There’s a difference between knowing the rules in theory and knowing how to use them.
▶ You learn and absorb the actual testing style because you emulate the exam with questions that have actually been used. Something always feels off about generic brands (I say as I eat these Kroger-brand canned pears).
▶ Even if you don’t know the rules, failing at remembering the issue or rule tells your brain, “Dude, I really need to know this, so make that connection!” You’re less likely to forget after getting called out by your brain. Win-win.
In fact, I want you to FAIL at remembering each rule at least once. Remember that it’s about attempts to recall, not mere familiarity.
This means that you don’t need to know absolutely everything there is to know. Rather, it’s impossible to remember all 800 pages of your outline. Hence, your first priority is to remember the rules that have been used in the past. Those are what you “should know.”
In other words, you can’t and don’t need to memorize everything, so you might as well prioritize the ones that have come up before.
If you want condensed outlines that streamline the most tested rules for you, try using Magicsheets. You’ll find it easier to handle and practice with 50 pages instead of a tome.
2. Understand the concepts.
One of the best ways to learn something is to teach it to someone else.
This means you have to understand it beyond just knowing what the words in the rule statement say. In this case, you don’t need to teach the law to anyone but yourself.
This is great! You don’t have to memorize every exact word your outline as long as you can say it in your own words, accurately. Being able to accurately reword it is evidence of understanding. It also helps if you can see why the rule is that way (the policy).
So despite swearing loyalty to Barbri, you don’t need to stress over remembering the rules exactly as it tells you (although it’s great if you do). When the time comes, you can state the rule as if you were explaining it to someone, keeping in mind that you should still be precise with certain standards (e.g., “foreseeable,” “reasonable” or “necessary to achieve a compelling government interest”).
To help with this…
▶ You can also associate a particular concept to something you already know to serve as a reminder instead of using brute recall. Like how I had to use a fictional character’s name to remember my coworker’s name for like a year (sad).
▶ You can sparingly create mnemonics on a need-to-know basis. Having too many of them may go against their very purpose because they’re supposed to help you remember stuff, not create more things to memorize.
▶ You can create visual tools, such as a table. Visually remembering that the location of the phrase “Never admissible” is on the right side immediately tells me that extrinsic evidence of a prior bad act of truthfulness is inadmissible. This is what I mean (taken from Magicsheets):
3. Rote memorize.
Of course, we also have the favorite of college students who want to party but also appear nerdy by choosing a biology or psychology major: rote memorization.
You thought you were out of the woods with the “understand the concepts” method? If you actually understand all the bar law, please stay still while we send a team of scientists to capture and keep you alive as a valuable specimen.
It would be tough if testing yourself with real questions is all you did because some rules have not been tested in past essays and may be tested for the first time (there’s always one or two WTF questions on each exam).
Which means there needs to be some rote memorization.
Once again, it’s the frequency of recall and attempts to recall that thing that improve your memory of that thing. It’s OK to not remember the first few times.
So you can ask yourself, “What’s needed for organizational standing?” Try to recite the answer. Don’t know it? Do your best. Then look it up. Keep testing yourself until you get it. You will have trouble with some rules. Don’t stop testing yourself when you’re merely familiar with what you see. Test yourself again in a few hours, the next day, in a few days. The more you do it, the better you retain it.
Want to take it a step further? Take strategic breaks.
According to the serial position effect, “the tendency of a person to recall the first and last items in a series best, and the middle items worst.” You could spike your usual study period with an artificial “end”—say, a planned 10-minute break in the middle that you know is coming.
Research on taking mental breaks (even small ones) shows “[t]hat learning and memory depend on both sleep and waking rest may partially explain why some of the most exceptional artists and athletes among us fall into a daily routine of intense practice punctuated by breaks and followed by a lengthy period of recuperation” (emphasis added).
And “[d]uring downtime, the brain also concerns itself with more mundane but equally important duties. . . . the brain consolidates recently accumulated data, memorizing the most salient information, and essentially rehearses recently learned skills, etching them into its tissue.”
Resting more (guilt-free!) while being more productive sounds good to me.
4. Shock yourself.
Someone wanted to know what was up with the Crim Pro acronyms in my Approsheets (issue checklists and flowcharts for essays):
I wonder what she’s talking about…
Poop references. Really?
What the hell have I been doing with my life? Maybe it’s time to… log out.
This is embarrassing. I hate having to show this to you. But the thing is, it’s helpful. I made those mnemonics back in law school and found them helpful, so I pulled them out of class notes from years yonder for your benefit.
In the midst of the doldrums and tedium of the bar, it doesn’t matter if it makes you cringe or if it shocks you because “[a]nything that helps memorize faster is useful” (especially thinking about ass):
(As a courtesy, the counterpart rules are now included with Approsheets-only packages.)
Just don’t tell anyone about your weirdo memory device.
“Anything that helps memorize faster is useful.” It doesn’t matter if it makes you cringe or if it shocks you.
When do I start memorizing?
Some say to memorize in the last 2 weeks for short-term memory. I personally tried to learn and memorize the concepts all throughout preparation. Isn’t that what studying is about?
As you write practice essays and answer MBE questions, the rules will naturally get etched into your head. And as you understand the concepts, you can start to recite rules with the appropriate keywords.
There’s nothing wrong with starting to memorize early (but don’t put off practice just to do this). Just because you will eventually forget something doesn’t mean you won’t retain it better the subsequent times you memorize it. In fact, “spacing” your studies and revisiting the material reinforces your memory of it.
Do I memorize or practice?
How do I split my time?
It depends on how close you are to bar week. Generally, I see it as a sliding scale where in the beginning you spend 2/3 of your time on reviewing rules and 1/3 on practice, and then as you get closer to the exam you spend 2/3 of your time on practice and 1/3 on review.
Your actions during review and practice can both contribute toward memorization in different ways:
- During review of the rules, you might focus on trying to understand the rules and rote memorize.
- During practice, you might focus on trying to remember the rules you studied.
- During review of your practice, you might focus on identifying key rules and rules that you missed.
Should I memorize everything?
This is not necessary or feasible. Prioritize based on these categories:
(1) law that has been tested in the past (which you can only find out by solving problems) + rules for related sub-issues, including nuances of each element of “big” rules, exceptions, defenses, related minor issues, etc. (see part 1 above)
(2) other law that you think is important
(3) fringe rules that you don’t think are important or worth the time
Dude, how do you expect me to remember all this?
Consolidate and summarize!
- Yet again: Memorize things by testing your recall frequently; go beyond mere familiarity
- Test yourself in real scenarios, e.g., past essays and MBE questions
- Understand the concept of what you’re trying to memorize
- Brute force your way by rote memorizing
- Get weird, interesting, and creative to make it stick
What has worked for you when trying to memorize a large amount of information? Have you tried the methods discussed above? Let me know below.