Many bar takers are obsessed with the idea of memorization for the bar exam.
Understandably, a lot of students naturally panic and have concerns about it. There’s a LOT to remember after all.
Novice bar takers tend to stay stuck thinking, “As long as I memorize this perfectly, I will be set for the bar exam.”
This may seem like a safe approach, but it’s actually reckless.
Panic mutates into paralysis because they end up bag-holding theoretical knowledge they don’t know when or how to use, neglect the performance test they don’t even need to memorize for in the first place, and end up with a score that’s not terrible but not great either. After all, they still know enough to be familiar with the material but not understand enough to apply it under pressure.
Maybe that’s why people are excited about the possibility of open-book bar exams in some states.
I eagerly await their realization that it’s not just about having access to information—but whether they can use the information properly. Removing the memorization requirement doesn’t really change the exam. In fact, it will probably hurt if you’re wasting time looking things up.
It’s not that I’m ragging on memorization. You should memorize to succeed on the bar exam—but not at the expense of learning how to wield the information.
Memorizing for the bar exam is simply table stakes. Everyone’s doing it. It’s a minimum requirement. Just a cost of entry.
So you do want to start memorizing as early as you can.
But I want to point out what bar takers miss when they get tunnel vision around memorization. Don’t miss the forest for the trees:
Continue reading “Myths of Memorizing for the Bar Exam”