Evidence: Relevancy and Excluding Relevant Evidence
A doctor, who is on trial for medical malpractice, called one of his nurses to the stand. The nurse testified that she has worked for the doctor every day for the last twelve years as his only nurse. The nurse explained that during that time, the doctor admitted every patient who presented with chest pains and inconclusive test results.
If the plaintiff objects, how should the judge rule?
A: Sustained, because this is inadmissible character evidence.
B: Sustained, because this is not relevant.
C: Overruled, because this is admissible habit evidence.
D: Overruled, because this is relevant and not privileged information.
Want to get more practice with over 1,600+ MBE questions?
Still on the fence?
👉🏻 Read this review of AdaptiBar and what others have said about it.
👉🏻 Test drive AdaptiBar for free.